JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.— Missouri Gov. Mike Parson announced late Monday afternoon that he would not grant clemency to spare the life of Marcellus Williams, who is scheduled to be put to death Tuesday night for the 1998 stabbing death of Lisha Gayle in University City.
Parson's decision was followed moments later by a decision by the state supreme court to reject an appeal in the case argued Monday morning, which focused on jury selection at trial and the prosecution's alleged mishandling of the murder weapon.
Williams, 55, has asserted his innocence.
The state Supreme Court should “correct an injustice” either by declaring that a prosecutor wrongly excluded a potential juror for racial reasons or by sending the case back to a lower court to determine that issue, attorney Jonathan Potts argued on behalf of Williams. Either action would have effectively cancel Tuesday's scheduled execution.
Republican Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's office has argued for the execution to proceed. The trial prosecutor has denied that he had racial motivations in removing potential jurors and did nothing improper — based on procedures at the time — by touching the murder weapon without gloves after it already had been tested by a crime lab, Assistant Attorney General Michael Spillane said in arguments to the state Supreme Court.
Attorneys for Williams also have an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, a clemency request before Republican Gov. Mike Parson focuses largely on how Gayle’s relatives want the sentence commuted to life in prison without parole. The NAACP also is urging Parson, a Republican, to stop the execution of Williams.
The execution would be the third in Missouri this year and the 15th nationwide.
Williams was hours away from being executed in August 2017 when then-Gov. Eric Greitens, a Republican, granted a stay after reviewing DNA evidence that found no trace of Williams’ DNA on the knife used in the killing. Greitens appointed a panel of retired judges to examine the case, but that panel never reached a conclusion.
Questions about DNA evidence also led Democratic St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell to request a hearing challenging Williams’ guilt. But days before the Aug. 21 hearing, new testing showed that the DNA evidence was spoiled because members of the prosecutor’s office touched the knife without gloves before the original trial.
With the DNA evidence unavailable, Midwest Innocence Project attorneys reached a compromise with the prosecutor’s office: Williams would enter a new, no-contest plea to first-degree murder in exchange for a new sentence of life in prison without parole.
Judge Bruce Hilton signed off on the agreement, as did Gayle’s family. But at Bailey’s urging, the Missouri Supreme Court blocked the agreement and ordered Hilton to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, which took place Aug. 28.
Hilton ruled on Sept. 12 that the first-degree murder conviction and death sentence would stand, noting that his arguments all had been previously rejected.
"There is no basis for a court to find that Williams is innocent, and no court has made such a finding,” Hilton wrote.
Williams' attorney argued that circumstances are different, because the trial prosecutor had not previously been questioned in court by Williams' attorney about the reason he removed a specific juror.
The prosecutor in the 2001 first-degree murder case, Keith Larner, testified at the August hearing that the trial jury was fair, even though it included just one Black member on the panel. Larner said he struck one potential Black juror partly because he looked too much like Williams. He didn’t explain why he felt that mattered.
The clemency petition from the Midwest Innocence Project focused heavily on how Gayle’s relatives want the sentence commuted to life without parole. Parson, a former sheriff, has been in office for 11 executions, and has never granted clemency.
In St. Louis County Monday afternoon, a few hours before he announced his decision, Parson told reporters that the victim’s family’s wishes don’t play a role in clemency considerations.
“A jury of his peers gave him the death sentence and a judge did and it's been upheld through the courts numerous, numerous times, where they've had different things that they brought up trying to make sure everything was correct,” he said. “Every process always comes back to where it all began and he was issued a death sentence many years ago and our job is to execute that when the time comes.
Prosecutors at Williams’ original trial said he broke into Gayle’s home on Aug. 11, 1998, heard water running in the shower, and found a large butcher knife. When Gayle came downstairs, she was stabbed 43 times. Her purse and her husband’s laptop computer were stolen.
Authorities said Williams stole a jacket to conceal blood on his shirt. Williams’ girlfriend asked him why he would wear a jacket on a hot day. The girlfriend said she later saw the purse and laptop in his car and that Williams sold the computer a day or two later.
Prosecutors also cited testimony from Henry Cole, who shared a cell with Williams in 1999 while Williams was jailed on unrelated charges. Cole told prosecutors Williams confessed to the killing and offered details about it.
Williams’ attorneys responded that the girlfriend and Cole were both convicted of felonies and wanted a $10,000 reward.
In Parson's announcement rejecting the clemency application, he said Williams' girlfriend never requested the reward and that a jailhouse informant in the case provided information about the crime that was not publicly available but was "consistent with crime scene evidence and Williams' involvement." Despite claims tied to mishandling of evidence, Parson said subsequent DNA testing has never exonerated Williams.
St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell said in a statement Monday night that his office would work to continue to save Williams' life.
"Even for those who disagree on the death penalty, when there is a shadow of a doubt of any defendant's guilt, the irreversible punishment of execution should not be an option. As the St. Louis County prosecutor, our office has questions about Mr. Williams guilt, but also about the integrity of his conviction," he said.